Buyer tools
The AI search visibility agency RFP: 25 questions, and who answers them in public
The records below are dated individually. Earlier market-wide availability and ranking totals have been withdrawn because they could not be reverified on 29 September 2026. Check the linked source for the offer and terms you are considering.
What the count shows
Key findings
- Dated recordsNo current market-wide total or winner is asserted. Each row identifies the source and original read date.
How this page was scored
Ten AI search visibility agencies, each read against the same 25 questions on its own public site and checked on 17 Sep 2026. A question counts as answered only when a buyer can find the answer without a call, a sign up or an email. Broadcastwell publishes this page and is not scored.
Yes
The company's own site answers the question in full. Every Yes on this page links to the page that answers it.
Partial
Part of the answer is published, for example a cadence where the question asks for a run count. Partials are printed but never added to the count.
No
No answer was found on the pages read. That is a claim about the pages, not about how the company works.
Read date
Every cell was read on the company's own public pages on 17 September 2026. No sign up, no email, no call.
Three limits carried from the read: Minuttia's method answers come from a published data study rather than its service pages, and the same applies to parts of Omniscient Digital's and Siege Media's; iPullRank's AI Search Manual sits behind an email form, so it was judged on its ungated pages only.
One cell was re-read on 17 September 2026: First Page Sage's price question was changed from Yes to No, because the tiers on its cost page are framed as prices seen among other companies rather than its own rates.
The evidence to require from an AI search visibility agency
Ask an agency to show the method, the dated receipts and the limits of its claims before you compare its proposal. These are requirements we can evidence in public; they do not replace the dated agency records below.
A published measurement method
The questions, denominators, capture rules, review and proof rules are published, so a buyer can examine how a claim was made.
Read our methodA public index with dated releases
Inspect the categories, vendors, released data and cited deposit. A later observation must not silently rewrite a released result.
Inspect the Absence IndexCounts with uncertainty
Require the answer count and base beside the 95 percent interval. A small sample should not become an unsupported claim about every buyer.
Check the interval methodHand-captured receipts
Require an engine label, model label, UTC capture time and visible citations. People capture our answers; Perplexity is retained only as the scored excerpt of at most 60 words and its share link.
Inspect the labelled fictional samplePricing and terms in full
Agree the deliverable, clock, refund terms and any entry credit before payment. Answer Repair completes one page or fix. Agency Deadline Audit supplies a client report and a paste-ready change. The current ladder and versioned terms state each scope.
Read all pricesA proof rule that matches the claim
Separate a dated before-and-after observation from evidence of causation. Criteria coverage is an observation with intervals and promises no inclusion, position, leads or revenue.
Read the Checklist rulesNo automated engine capture
Our team uses signed-in seats and one exact question per fresh chat. No script, extension or automation asks an engine for an answer or copies its output.
See the Buyer's ChecklistThe 25 questions
Five groups of five. Each question says why it matters and what a verifiable answer looks like, with how many of the ten agencies answer it in public.
Method, Q1 to Q5
Q1. Is the question set published?
Why it matters. The questions decide the answer. A score built on questions you cannot read cannot be checked or repeated.
A verifiable answer. The actual questions, or the rules they are written to, printed where a buyer can read them before paying.
Q2. Are the classification rules published?
Why it matters. Whether an answer counts as naming you depends on the rule. Loose rules inflate a score.
A verifiable answer. A written rule for what counts as named, cited or absent, for example word boundary matching on the brand.
Q3. How many runs per question, with repeats?
Why it matters. The same question returns different answers on different runs. One run is an anecdote.
A verifiable answer. A stated number of runs per question and engine, not only a cadence such as weekly.
Q4. Which engines are read, named one by one?
Why it matters. Engines disagree with each other. A result only means something for the engines it names.
A verifiable answer. Each engine named in the service description a buyer reads, not only in a blog post.
Q5. Is the method versioned and dated?
Why it matters. Without a version, a buyer cannot tell whether two reports were measured the same way.
A verifiable answer. A version number and a date on the method, with changes published before they are used.
Measurement and evidence, Q6 to Q10
Q6. Is a baseline measured before the work starts?
Why it matters. Movement can only be shown against a starting point measured the same way.
A verifiable answer. A named baseline deliverable at the start of the engagement, on a fixed question set.
Q7. Can the buyer see the raw answer text behind every result?
Why it matters. A rate is a summary. The answer text is the evidence.
A verifiable answer. Every observed answer handed over as the engine returned it, not only a score.
Q8. Are the sources each engine cited shown per answer?
Why it matters. The cited sources are where the fix usually is.
A verifiable answer. The cited URLs listed against each answer, not only an aggregate citation rate.
Q9. Is variance between runs reported?
Why it matters. If runs disagree, an average hides it.
A verifiable answer. The run to run spread or the disagreement between runs printed beside each rate.
Q10. Is the measurement repeatable by the buyer or a third party?
Why it matters. A measurement nobody else can repeat has to be taken on trust.
A verifiable answer. Enough published method that a third party could rerun it and check the arithmetic.
Deliverables, Q11 to Q15
Q11. What exactly arrives, named as artefacts?
Why it matters. A service category is not a deliverable.
A verifiable answer. A list of named artefacts, for example a baseline report, a fix list and a roadmap.
Q12. When does each artefact arrive?
Why it matters. A timeline in months is not a delivery date.
A verifiable answer. A stated turnaround for a named artefact, for example findings within a set number of hours.
Q13. Who does the work?
Why it matters. A buyer is paying for people as much as for a method.
A verifiable answer. A stated team, or a named lead for the engagement.
Q14. Does the buyer get data access, and keep it?
Why it matters. A dashboard that disappears at cancellation leaves the buyer with nothing to compare against.
A verifiable answer. Access to the data during the work, with retained access or an export stated for after it.
Q15. What does the buyer keep when the engagement ends?
Why it matters. Work product that stays with the vendor is not work product the buyer owns.
A verifiable answer. A written statement of what the buyer keeps on exit.
Commercial terms, Q16 to Q20
Q16. Is an entry price published?
Why it matters. Without a price a buyer cannot compare before a call.
A verifiable answer. The company's own price for a named offer, not an industry survey figure.
Q17. Can the buyer pay without a call?
Why it matters. Every call is a step between the buyer and the evidence.
A verifiable answer. A checkout for at least one offer.
Q18. Is the minimum term published?
Why it matters. A minimum term is the real price of a retainer.
A verifiable answer. The minimum commitment in months or weeks, in writing.
Q19. Is there a written guarantee or refund term?
Why it matters. Answers vary run to run, so the refund is the part of the risk a vendor can carry.
A verifiable answer. The trigger, the window and the exclusions of any refund, in writing.
Q20. How does the buyer cancel?
Why it matters. The notice period decides how long a buyer pays after deciding to stop.
A verifiable answer. A stated notice period or the words month to month, in writing.
Proof, Q21 to Q25
Q21. Are there named B2B software case studies?
Why it matters. Anonymous cases cannot be checked.
A verifiable answer. A named client in B2B software with its own case page.
Q22. Does a case study publish its measurement?
Why it matters. A result without its baseline and method is a claim, not a finding.
A verifiable answer. A dated baseline, the method, the window and the numbers the claim rests on.
Q23. Is original research published with its sample and method?
Why it matters. Research shows whether a company measures anything at all.
A verifiable answer. A study with a stated sample size, collection window and classification rules.
Q24. Is data published openly with a licence or DOI?
Why it matters. Open data can be checked by anyone; a download with no licence cannot be cited safely.
A verifiable answer. A dataset with a licence and a DOI.
Q25. Is there a published correction route for the site's own claims?
Why it matters. Pages go stale. A correction route is how errors get fixed.
A verifiable answer. A stated way to report an error and a statement that corrections are made.
The board
Full Yes answers out of 25, with the Yes count in each group. The default order is alphabetical; sort by any heading. Broadcastwell publishes this page and is not on the board.
| As of | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citant | 12 | 5 | 2 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 3 of 5 | 4 of 5 | 2 of 5 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| First Page Sage | 0 | 5 | 0 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Go Fish Digital | 2 | 2 | 0 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| iPullRank | 6 | 2 | 1 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 2 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Minuttia | 4 | 9 | 2 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 2 of 5 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Omniscient Digital | 5 | 4 | 1 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 2 of 5 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Optimist | 10 | 2 | 1 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 4 of 5 | 3 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Siege Media | 5 | 3 | 0 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 2 of 5 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Single Grain | 2 | 5 | 1 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 0 of 5 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| WebFX | 7 | 5 | 1 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 2 of 5 | 2 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 17 Sep 2026 |
By group, across the ten agencies: method 9 Yes of 50, measurement and evidence 5 Yes of 50, deliverables 15 Yes of 50, commercial terms 12 Yes of 50, proof 12 Yes of 50. The market answers what it delivers and what it charges; it rarely answers how a result can be checked.
The questions nobody answers
The nine questions with no Yes from any of the ten agencies.
| Question | Yes | Partial | As of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1. Is the question set published? | 0 | 6 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Q3. How many runs per question, with repeats? | 0 | 5 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Q5. Is the method versioned and dated? | 0 | 3 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Q7. Can the buyer see the raw answer text behind every result? | 0 | 0 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Q8. Are the sources each engine cited shown per answer? | 0 | 1 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Q9. Is variance between runs reported? | 0 | 1 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Q10. Is the measurement repeatable by the buyer or a third party? | 0 | 1 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Q17. Can the buyer pay without a call? | 0 | 0 | 17 Sep 2026 |
| Q24. Is data published openly with a licence or DOI? | 0 | 1 | 17 Sep 2026 |
Every answer, with its source
Each company's Yes and Partial answers, with the page that answers each one. Open a company to see its full list.
Go Fish Digital: 2 Yes, 2 Partial
- Partial Q4. Names Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT only; no full engine list. gofishdigital.com/services/generative-engine-optimization/
- Yes Q11. Semantic content audit, Google AI Overviews analysis, technical fixes, digital PR placements. gofishdigital.com/services/generative-engine-optimization/
- Partial Q14. Barracuda platform clients use; retained access after engagement not stated. gofishdigital.com/marketing-intelligence
- Yes Q21. SimpleTexting named, B2B SMS software, organic SQL result. gofishdigital.com/results/
Checked 17 Sep 2026.
iPullRank: 6 Yes, 2 Partial
- Partial Q1. Keyword portfolio maps synthetic query gaps; set itself not published. ipullrank.com/ai-search-strategy-program
- Yes Q4. ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews named individually. ipullrank.com/ai-search-metrics
- Yes Q6. "AI Search visibility baseline" listed as a first-stage deliverable. ipullrank.com/services/geo
- Yes Q11. Six named artefacts: keyword portfolio, content audit, content plan, measurement plan, audit, roadmap. ipullrank.com/ai-search-strategy-program
- Yes Q13. Named founder and named role leads attached to the program. ipullrank.com/ai-search-strategy-program
- Partial Q14. Measurement plan sets up a data pipeline and dashboards; ownership not stated. ipullrank.com/ai-search-strategy-program
- Yes Q16. "Starting at $15,000/month". ipullrank.com/ai-search-strategy-program
- Yes Q23. 13.1bn search events, named panel source, 15-month window, classification rules. ipullrank.com/zero-click-behavior-analysis-q3-2026
Checked 17 Sep 2026.
Optimist: 10 Yes, 2 Partial
- Partial Q3. "Weekly AI visibility tracking" is a cadence, not a run count. yesoptimist.com/full-service-seo/
- Yes Q4. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google's conversational AI, Claude, Google AI Overviews named. yesoptimist.com/ai-search-optimization-services/
- Yes Q6. Audit of current visibility across the five models precedes work. yesoptimist.com/ai-search-optimization-services/
- Yes Q11. Articles, refreshes, landing pages, links, technical sprints, schema; 4 to 5 per month. yesoptimist.com/full-service-seo/
- Partial Q12. Results horizon 1 to 3 months; no per-artefact delivery date. yesoptimist.com/full-service-seo/
- Yes Q13. Named founder leads strategy and calls; named human editorial review. yesoptimist.com/full-service-seo/
- Yes Q14. Custom reporting dashboard; clients retain dashboards and data on exit. yesoptimist.com/full-service-seo/
- Yes Q15. On cancellation clients keep roadmap, content, links, schema, dashboards, data. yesoptimist.com/full-service-seo/
- Yes Q16. $2,500 roadmap; $3,000/month advisory; no full-service rate shown on this page. Price checked 28 October 2026.. yesoptimist.com/ai-search-optimization-services/
- Yes Q18. "Month-to-month with no minimum commitment". yesoptimist.com/full-service-seo/
- Yes Q20. 30-day notice to cancel. yesoptimist.com/full-service-seo/
- Yes Q21. Stampli named, B2B financial automation software. yesoptimist.com/case-study-stampli/
Checked 17 Sep 2026.
Siege Media: 5 Yes, 3 Partial
- Partial Q4. Engines named in a research post, not in the service description. siegemedia.com/research/ai-traffic-conversion-rate
- Yes Q6. "Baseline LLM share-of-voice benchmark" in the Month 1 to 2 phase. siegemedia.com/services/geo
- Yes Q11. Monthly share-of-voice reporting, citation tracking per asset, referral benchmarking, quarterly reviews. siegemedia.com/services/geo
- Partial Q12. Phases dated in months; no artefact delivery dates. siegemedia.com/services/geo
- Partial Q13. Roughly 80 named staff listed; no team size for an engagement. siegemedia.com/about
- Yes Q18. "6+ month minimum commitment". siegemedia.com/services/geo
- Yes Q21. Zendesk, Zapier, Zoom, HubSpot, Airtable named. siegemedia.com/work/all
- Yes Q23. 78 sites, Jan to May 2026, GA4 key-event rate, screening thresholds. siegemedia.com/research/ai-traffic-conversion-rate
Checked 17 Sep 2026.
Omniscient Digital: 5 Yes, 4 Partial
- Partial Q1. 200 BOFU prompts, six intent types, how built; set not published, research not service. beomniscient.com/blog/g2-acquisition-ai-citation-share/
- Partial Q3. Single run, February 2026; no repeat count. beomniscient.com/blog/g2-acquisition-ai-citation-share/
- Yes Q4. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google's conversational AI, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews named. beomniscient.com/blog/content-types-cited-in-llms/
- Partial Q5. Study dated February 2026; no method version. beomniscient.com/blog/g2-acquisition-ai-citation-share/
- Partial Q6. Opportunity and citation analysis precede work; not called a baseline. beomniscient.com/services/generative-engine-optimization/
- Yes Q11. Opportunity analysis, citation analysis, technical assessment, roadmap, monitoring. beomniscient.com/services/generative-engine-optimization/
- Yes Q16. $120,000/year full-service floor; billing schedule not stated. Price checked 28 October 2026.. beomniscient.com/services/seo-strategy/
- Yes Q21. Jasper, Smartling, SuperTokens, SpotDraft, Lokalise, 360Learning named. beomniscient.com/case-studies/
- Yes Q23. Ten own studies listed with prompt counts and citation counts. beomniscient.com/research/
Checked 17 Sep 2026.
Minuttia: 4 Yes, 9 Partial
- Partial Q1. Prompt counts and four prompt types published; set itself not published. study.minuttia.com/methodology
- Yes Q2. Deterministic match to a 5,983-brand corpus; ambiguous names excluded. study.minuttia.com/methodology
- Partial Q3. Single execution per prompt on Google; not stated for other surfaces. study.minuttia.com/methodology
- Yes Q4. Google Search + Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Google's conversational AI, Claude, Perplexity named. study.minuttia.com/methodology
- Partial Q5. Wave-1 24 Aug 2026, snapshot 26 Aug 2026; no version number. study.minuttia.com/methodology
- Partial Q9. States results vary by time, location, account and repetition; no interval given. study.minuttia.com/methodology
- Partial Q10. Method described and aggregate data downloadable; no reproduction instructions. study.minuttia.com/methodology
- Partial Q11. Service categories listed; no itemized artefacts. minuttia.com/geo-agency/
- Partial Q13. Managing Director named; no team size for the work. minuttia.com/geo-agency/
- Yes Q21. Meilisearch, Toggl, Vowel, Respona, Viral Loops named. minuttia.com/case-studies/
- Partial Q22. Names tools and date range; conversion and visibility maths undisclosed. minuttia.com/case-studies/meilisearch/
- Yes Q23. AI Visibility Data Study, 24,067 prompts, five surfaces. study.minuttia.com/
- Partial Q24. "Download all aggregate data" offered; no licence and no DOI. study.minuttia.com/
Checked 17 Sep 2026.
First Page Sage: 0 Yes, 5 Partial
- Partial Q4. ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI Overviews named in one case; not on the service page. firstpagesage.com/fps-geo-case-study-nearshore-software-development-company/
- Partial Q11. Six optimisation elements listed as roles, not as artefacts. firstpagesage.com/generative-engine-optimization-services/
- Partial Q21. Cadence Design Systems named; AI search visibility cases otherwise anonymized. firstpagesage.com/case-studies/
- Partial Q22. Names tracking tool and share over three years; no query set or baseline method. firstpagesage.com/fps-geo-case-study-nearshore-software-development-company/
- Partial Q23. Proprietary campaign data Q1 2021 to Q3 2025; no sample size or collection method. firstpagesage.com/reports/seo-roi-statistics-fc/
Checked 17 Sep 2026.
Single Grain: 2 Yes, 5 Partial
- Partial Q1. "Find Your Best AI Questions & Keywords" describes building a set, not the set. singlegrain.com/agency/generative-engine-optimization-services/
- Yes Q4. ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google's conversational AI, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot named. singlegrain.com/agency/generative-engine-optimization-services/
- Yes Q11. Content briefs, expert guides, Q&A hubs, author bios, schema, AI search visibility dashboards. singlegrain.com/agency/generative-engine-optimization-services/
- Partial Q12. Citations improve in 2 to 3 months, gains in 4 to 6; no artefact dates. singlegrain.com/agency/aeo-services/
- Partial Q13. "Dedicated AI answer optimization team" stated; no size and no named owner. singlegrain.com/agency/aeo-services/
- Partial Q14. Custom dashboards provided; retained access not stated. singlegrain.com/agency/aeo-services/
- Partial Q21. SmartRent and Learning A-Z named; B2B software status not stated. singlegrain.com/case-studies/
Checked 17 Sep 2026.
WebFX: 7 Yes, 5 Partial
- Partial Q1. 50 to 2,000 tracked prompts per tier published; set and construction not published. webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/
- Partial Q3. Each prompt tested across all ten engines; no repeat run count. webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/
- Yes Q4. Ten engines named: ChatGPT, Google's conversational AI, Perplexity, Copilot, Claude, Meta AI, Grok, DuckDuckGo, Apple Intelligence, Bing. webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/
- Yes Q6. Baseline AI visibility audit, 500 to 50,000 prompts by tier. webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/
- Yes Q11. Baseline audit, monthly scoring, brand perception analysis, content pieces per tier. webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/
- Partial Q12. Monthly optimisation cadence over six months; no artefact dates. webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/
- Yes Q13. Dedicated consultant per plan; "750+ SMEs" stated. webfx.com/seo/pricing/
- Partial Q14. Dashboard with unlimited seats and SSO; access after cancellation not stated. webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/
- Yes Q16. Tiers from $3k to $68,250+ per month. webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/
- Yes Q18. Six-month minimum commitment. webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/
- Partial Q21. One client tagged SaaS & Software B2B; the case is paid media, not AI search. webfx.com/case-studies/
- Yes Q23. 2,371,151 keywords, classification by length, intent and vertical. webfx.com/blog/seo/where-and-why-google-ai-overviews-appear-2-3m-keywords-study/
Checked 17 Sep 2026.
Citant: 12 Yes, 5 Partial
- Partial Q1. Ten agreed target queries fixed at onboarding and reused; set not published. citant.ai/services/ai-visibility/
- Yes Q2. Three states: named, retrieved but not named, absent. citant.ai/services/ai-visibility/
- Partial Q3. One run per platform per month; no repeat count per question. citant.ai/services/ai-visibility/
- Yes Q4. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google's conversational AI, Claude, Copilot, Google AI Overviews named. citant.ai/services/ai-visibility/
- Partial Q5. Method "last verified August 2026"; no version number. citant.ai/services/ai-visibility/
- Yes Q6. Audit sets a baseline Share of Model before the engagement. citant.ai/services/ai-search-audit/
- Partial Q8. Ghost-citation rate per platform where sources surface; not per answer. citant.ai/services/ai-visibility/
- Yes Q11. Baseline Share of Model, 4-Layer scorecard, prioritized fix list. citant.ai/services/ai-search-audit/
- Yes Q12. Delivered within 72 hours of kickoff; nine-week engagement. citant.ai/services/ai-search-audit/
- Yes Q13. Founder named as sole public practitioner on the work. citant.ai/about/
- Partial Q15. Underlying exports available on request; no buyer-side export. citant.ai/case-studies/ai-toolbox/
- Yes Q16. $440 audit, three payments of $2,625 ($7,875 total) for the nine-week engagement, retainer from $5,000/mo. citant.ai/pricing/
- Yes Q18. Nine-week engagement; three-month retainer minimum. citant.ai/pricing/
- Yes Q19. Named in 3 of 10 queries on 2 of 6 platforms in nine weeks, or full refund. citant.ai/pricing/
- Yes Q20. Retainer releases on 30 days notice after the initial term of three months. citant.ai/pricing/
- Yes Q22. Dated baseline 27 Apr 2026, execution window, five tracked points, dated exports. citant.ai/case-studies/ai-toolbox/
- Yes Q25. States that every number on its site carries a source and invites readers to flag one that does not. citant.ai/about/
Checked 17 Sep 2026.
Cite this page: The AI search visibility agency RFP: 25 questions, and who answers them in public. Broadcastwell. Originally recorded 18 September 2026. https://broadcastwell.com/geo-agency-rfp
What this page does not prove
This page records what each company publishes on its own site on the date beside it. It does not measure the quality of anyone's work, it does not rank outcomes, and a company that publishes less is not necessarily worse at the job. Pages change; a cell is only true for its read date.
An agency that answers a question on a call, in a proposal or in a contract may answer it well; this page only records what a buyer can read before any of that. The ten agencies were chosen by Broadcastwell from the companies on its comparison pages; they are not a random sample of the market.
About the publisher
Broadcastwell publishes this list and sells Answer Operations. We do not score ourselves here. Read the two $490 entry scopes and the full ladder on our pricing page. Prices and terms. Our methodology. Three named client accounts. We do not claim a third-party review score here.
Questions
What should we ask an AI search visibility agency before hiring one?
Ask the 25 questions on this page, in five groups: method, measurement and evidence, deliverables, commercial terms and proof. The evidence group matters most, because it decides whether you can check a result yourself: can you see the raw answer text behind every result, are the cited sources shown per answer, is the variance between runs reported, and could a third party repeat the measurement. Across the ten agencies read, those four questions drew not a single Yes answer.
Which AI search visibility agency answers the most of these questions in public?
The earlier aggregate conclusion was removed in the 29 September 2026 recheck. The dated source records below let you verify a specific provider; they do not establish a current market-wide result.
Can we pay an AI search visibility agency without a sales call?
The earlier aggregate conclusion was removed in the 29 September 2026 recheck. The dated source records below let you verify a specific provider; they do not establish a current market-wide result.
Is a Partial as good as a Yes?
No. A Partial means part of the answer is on the site, for example a cadence of weekly tracking where the question asks how many runs there are per question. The counts on this page use full Yes answers only and print Partials separately.
Can we use these questions in our own RFP?
Yes. Copy all 25 with the button on this page, print the page, or download the CSV, which carries every verdict with its source and read date. Please cite the page if you publish the list.
Answer Repair is $490 for one buyer question and one completed source-backed page or fix, Live or Handoff, due 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready. Agency Deadline Audit is $490 per client report for ten agreed buyer questions, dated answer evidence, three prioritized fixes and one paste-ready change of 250 words or fewer. Findings are due within 48 hours of recorded scope confirmation. Read /pricing and the versioned /terms for each scope and refund condition.
One buyer question. One completed repair.
Answer Repair is $490 for one source-backed page or fix. Choose Live or Handoff before payment. We confirm Ready within 60 minutes during business hours. If anything is missing, a member of our team contacts you directly and finishes it with you.
Due 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready. If we miss the deliverable or deadline, we initiate a full $490 refund within five business days. You keep the work. You may also request a full refund within 30 days of delivery.
Fix one answer, $490One buyer question. One completed repair.
We build one source-backed page or fix for $490. Choose Live or Handoff before payment. We confirm Ready within 60 minutes during business hours. If anything is missing, a member of our team contacts you directly and finishes it with you. The deadline is 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready.
If we miss the deliverable or deadline, we initiate a full $490 refund within five business days. You keep the work. You may also request a full refund within 30 days of delivery.
Fix one answer, $490