AI SEO agencies for enterprise B2B, and what the measurement can actually tell you
Broadcastwell ran this measurement and sells AI search visibility services, which makes us a competitor of every firm named on this page. We are not in the ranking. We were named in 0 of the 200 answers and cited 0 times among the 663 citations. We also did not measure lead generation, and the first section explains why that matters before you read the counts.
What this measurement can and cannot answer
The question in the title contains two things. One of them is measurable and one of them is not, and most pages in this category quietly merge them.
Measurable: which agencies four AI engines name when a buyer asks for a shortlist, and which domains those engines open on the way to the answer. We ran that and the numbers are below. Not measurable from this: which agency will generate the most enterprise B2B pipeline for you. Nothing in 200 AI answers speaks to that. No engine offered an outcome-based ranking, and we did not ask any question that would have invited one.
Naming still matters for lead generation, but through a narrow and specific channel: if a buyer asks an engine for a shortlist and you are not on it, you do not enter that deal. That is a real loss and it is countable. It is not the same claim as an agency being better at demand generation, and we are not making that claim here.
Who gets named without being prompted
Between 22:30 on 26 July and 01:15 on 27 July 2026 we put ten buyer questions to Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews, five times over. Forty answers per run, 200 in total.
| Question shape | Answers | Why it behaves that way |
|---|---|---|
| Questions that named an agency | 80 | Alternatives-to and one-firm-versus-another shapes |
| Questions that named no agency | 120 | Open shortlist requests |
The 120 name-free answers are the only ones that resemble a buyer opening a shortlist from scratch.
| Agency | 120 name-free answers | All 200 answers |
|---|---|---|
| Omniscient Digital | 15 | 49 |
| Hamster Garage | 3 | 19 |
| Minuttia | 1 | 15 |
| Rampiq | 0 | 14 |
| Zupo | 0 | 13 |
Five firms, 19 namings across 120 name-free answers. One firm took 15 of them. The other four combined took 4.
The distance between the two columns is the point. Rampiq was named 14 times across all 200 answers and zero times across the 120 that named nobody. Every one of its namings came from a question that had already put a name in front of the engine.
The citation layer, and who owns it
The 200 answers returned 663 citations across 223 distinct domains. 129 of those domains were cited exactly once, which is a tail long enough to look like breadth and thin enough to carry no weight.
The eight most-cited domains in this category were all owned by the agencies they describe: beomniscient.com 41, hamstergarage.com 39, rampiq.agency 25, minuttia.com 24, discoveredlabs.com 20, zupo.co 19, yesoptimist.com 17 and embarque.io 15. No review site, no analyst and no community forum appeared above them.
For an enterprise buyer this is worth sitting with. The engines assembling your shortlist are, in this category, reading the vendors and summarising them. Third-party validation is thinner than the marketing in this space implies, and the practical consequence is that the source material an engine can find about you is largely the material you published.
How to read a shortlist you did not write
Three checks, in order, on any AI-generated agency shortlist including this one.
Check the question. If the prompt contained a company name, the answer is contaminated and the counts will overstate whoever was named. Check the sample. One answer is an anecdote, and engines vary between runs, so a single screenshot proves nothing. Check who ran it. Every agency-versus-agency page on the internet was written by someone with a position, this one included, which is why we exclude ourselves from the ranking and publish our own score of 0 of 40 on our own visibility page.
The same three checks apply to your own category. If you want the numbers for it rather than for ours, that is what the full audit produces: ten buyer questions, four engines, a two-page findings document, and no call required.
Method and limits
Questions
Which AI SEO agencies get named for enterprise B2B work?
Across 200 answers from four engines the five named most often were Omniscient Digital 49, Hamster Garage 19, Minuttia 15, Rampiq 14 and Zupo 13. On the 120 answers whose question named no agency the counts were 15, 3, 1, 0 and 0. No question in the set asked engines to rank agencies by lead generation results, and no engine offered that as a basis.
Does this measurement tell you which agency generates the most leads?
No. It measures how often each firm is named and cited by four AI engines. Lead generation outcomes were not measured and are not inferable from naming counts. An agency named 49 times may or may not produce pipeline for an enterprise B2B software company.
Why does the name-free count matter more than the total?
Because 80 of the 200 answers came from questions that already named an agency, in the shape of alternatives-to and one-firm-versus-another. Those questions hand the engine a name and then reward it for repeating it. The 120 answers whose question named nobody are the ones that resemble a real buyer opening a shortlist.
Is Broadcastwell included in this ranking?
No. Broadcastwell ran the measurement and sells in this category, so it is excluded from every ranking on this site. Broadcastwell was named in 0 of the 200 answers and cited 0 times among the 663 citations.
Run the same measurement on your own category
Five buyer questions through two engines, results by email in about ten minutes. No call required.
Run your free instant check