By the Broadcastwell teamPublished 15 September 2026Fact dates appear with each recordSelected claims rechecked 29 September 202613 minute read
Broadcastwell publishes this page and is not on the list: the companies below are listed alphabetically and none of them is ranked. This page compares AI SEO agencies that sell to B2B companies, on a published method, open data with a DOI, engine coverage stated by name, an entry price published and payable without a call, published refund terms, named B2B software case studies, third party reviews, and whether the buyer's own AI can read the results. Every cell was read on each company's own site on 15 September 2026.
All 9 at a glance
Eight criteria a buyer can verify. Full detail in each entry below. Every price carries the date it was checked.
The 9 companies on this page, with best fit, published entry price and score out of eight
YesPartialNoOne segment for each of the eight criteria, in the order of the scorecard.
Key takeaways
What is the difference between AI SEO and GEO?
AI SEO usually means classic search work extended to cover AI surfaces: the same crawling, content and authority levers, now aimed at answers as well as links. GEO usually means the narrower job of being named and cited inside a generated answer. In practice most firms on this page sell both under one contract, which is why the useful question is not which label they use but which engines they measure and how.
How was this list scored?
On eight criteria checkable on each company's own website: published method with the question set and the classification rules, open data with a DOI, engines named, an entry price published and payable without a call, published refund terms, named B2B software case studies, third party reviews with a count, and whether the results reach the buyer's own systems.
What does it cost?
Compare the dated, company-specific published prices in the table. Five of the nine publish no price at all.
Does AI SEO produce leads?
Several firms on this page publish lead and pipeline figures against named clients, and those figures are linked in their rows. None of them, and not Broadcastwell, can guarantee a lead or a revenue outcome. Broadcastwell's own published research measures mentions and citations, not lead generation outcomes.
Is Broadcastwell on this list?
Broadcastwell publishes this comparison and sells Answer Operations services in this market. We exclude ourselves from the scored tables. Read the dated sources and scope for each provider.
What a B2B buyer is actually buying
AI SEO and GEO are sold as different things and delivered as mostly the same thing. AI SEO extends classic search work to AI surfaces, using the crawling, content and authority levers that already existed. GEO narrows to one outcome, being named and cited inside a generated answer. The overlap is large, because the pages the engines cite are frequently the pages search engines already rank. What separates the firms on this page is not the label. It is whether they will tell you which engines they measured, how many times, and what counted as a mention.
That matters more for B2B than for consumer brands, because a B2B shortlist is short. When an engine answers a question about the best vendor in a software category, it usually names three to five companies. Being the sixth is the same as being absent.
It also matters because the demand is hard to see in analytics. Traffic that starts in an AI answer often arrives with no referrer and is recorded as direct, or as mail to a generic inbox. A firm that reports only sessions and rankings is measuring the part of the funnel that did not change.
The earlier July 2026 agency mention counts have been withdrawn because the underlying answer records could not be reverified. The separate 2026 State of GEO study reports 860 AI answers across 85 B2B software companies in 61 categories and 5,160 citations across 1,753 domains. That separate open-access study is not peer reviewed.
How we scored
Every cell below was read on each company's own site on 15 September 2026. Reviews were read on Clutch for every company, and on G 2 where G 2 allowed the read, on 16 September 2026. Facts rechecked on 25 September 2026 say so where they appear. Where a company does not publish something, the cell says No rather than guessing. The companies are listed alphabetically. Nobody on this page is ranked, and the publisher is not scored.
Method
Method published, and at least one complete question set public: a study dataset, an index, a public sample or a named case.
Open data
Open data published with a DOI.
Engines
Engine coverage stated by name.
Price
Entry price published and buyable without a call.
Refund
Refund or guarantee terms published.
B2B cases
Named B2B software case studies on the site.
Reviews
Third party reviews, with the count.
Machine readable
The buyer's own AI can read the results, through an account, an export or a connector.
Yes means a reader can verify it on the company's own site. Partial means part of it is published, for example a price that is published but sold only through a call. No means the company's own site does not publish it. For the method criterion, Yes means the method is published and at least one complete question set is public, in a study dataset, an index, a public sample or a named case; Partial means a method is described but no question set is public; No means neither.
Read on each company's own site on 15 September 2026. Reviews were read on 16 September 2026, on Clutch for every company and on G2 where G2 allowed the read, and each cell names the platform behind its count.
The list
Directive Consulting: best for pipeline and revenue reporting for B2B software
2 of 8verifiable yeses
MethodPartial
Open dataNo
EnginesPartial
PriceNo
RefundNo
B2B casesYes
ReviewsYes
Machine readablePartial
What they do well
Its Case Status study carries a modified date, names the monitoring tool used, names three AI surfaces and gives stepwise tactics.
Two named case studies are framed around AI search outcomes rather than traffic alone.
The homepage states the number of brands served and lists its office locations.
Limitations
No pricing is published, including on the new software company package page.
Its published methodology page names no AI engine and publishes no measurement method.
First Page Sage: best for off site levers, lists, databases and reviews
2 of 8verifiable yeses
MethodPartial
Open dataNo
EnginesYes
PriceNo
RefundNo
B2B casesYes
ReviewsNo
Machine readableNo
What they do well
It names four target engines and publishes a six element GEO method that includes off site levers such as list creation, database inclusion and review management.
It states on the GEO page the date the service launched, which is a dated claim rather than a general assertion.
Its anonymized GEO case study publishes a tracked prompt count of 620 and a citation share movement from 23 percent to 77 percent.
Limitations
No service price is shown on the GEO page read on 28 October 2026.
Seven of its eight case studies name no client, and the one named study is classic SEO rather than AI search.
Graphite: best for quarterly prompt sets validated against product usage
2 of 8verifiable yeses
MethodPartial
Open dataNo
EnginesYes
PriceNo
RefundNo
B2B casesYes
ReviewsNot verified
Machine readableNo
What they do well
The AEO page sets out six named service components, including prompt research, citation tracking and offsite strategy, and names five AI engines.
Its research hub publishes dated studies through 2026 on AI article volume and prompt tracking behavior.
Case studies carry named clients with stated AI visibility metrics, including share of voice growth from LLMs.
Limitations
No client facing dashboard, data export or API is described on the AEO or SEO pages.
NP Digital: best for global scale across many markets
3 of 8verifiable yeses
MethodPartial
Open dataNo
EnginesYes
PriceNo
RefundNo
B2B casesYes
ReviewsYes
Machine readablePartial
What they do well
Its RefiJet case study carries a modified date on the page, names four answer engines and describes the technique in specific terms.
The AI search solution page publishes a four phase framework and names its reporting partner.
The homepage states operational scale in employees, countries and clients rather than leaving it unstated.
Limitations
No pricing is published anywhere on the site.
The single case study shown on the AI search solution page itself is anonymized.
Omniscient Digital: best for B2B software with pipeline reporting
3 of 8verifiable yeses
MethodPartial
Open dataNo
EnginesYes
PricePartial
RefundNo
B2B casesYes
ReviewsYes
Machine readablePartial
What they do well
The SEO strategy page publishes a $120,000 annual floor for full-service engagements, so you can check the stated entry cost before a call.
Almost every case study is a named B2B software client, including Jasper, Smartling, SpotDraft and Lokalise, with several reporting pipeline figures rather than traffic alone.
Its homepage reports an 81 percent increase in LLM visibility and a 140 percent increase in AI citations for Convert over 60 days. These are the agency's own case-study claims (as of 29 Sep 2026).
Limitations
Publishes no guarantee, refund or contract term.
Its own AI information page carries no pricing, no engagement minimum and no client list, so it does not match the pricing published on the services page.
Optimist: best for a published price ladder for B2B SaaS
2 of 8verifiable yeses
MethodPartial
Open dataNo
EnginesYes
PricePartial
RefundNo
B2B casesYes
ReviewsNot verified
Machine readablePartial
What they do well
The AI search page gives a $2,500 floor for a one-time roadmap and a $3,000 monthly advisory floor. You can check those entry costs before a call.
The AEO page names seven surfaces, including ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google's conversational AI, Google AI Overviews, Google and Bing.
It publishes three AEO case studies with LLM revenue and LLM referral figures, and names B2B software clients including Stampli, Contentstack and HelloSign elsewhere on the site.
Limitations
The three AEO case studies name no client, describing them as a large B2B tech client, a retail client and a fintech client.
The CORE Framework page describes stages and phases but publishes no scoring rubric, prompt set or classification rules.
Siege Media: best for content led programmes with a published minimum
2 of 8verifiable yeses
MethodPartial
Open dataNo
EnginesPartial
PricePartial
RefundNo
B2B casesYes
ReviewsYes
Machine readablePartial
What they do well
It publishes both a minimum, $8,000 per month, and the contract shape, a 12 month term with a 30 day out clause, which few firms in this set do.
Two named client case studies report AI search outcomes, Zendesk and Mentimeter, the latter at 124,000 ChatGPT sessions over six months.
Its about page publishes an aggregate figure for client traffic value rather than leaving scale unstated.
Limitations
The GEO service page names no AI engine, referring to LLMs generically.
No open dataset or DOI backs the citation figure quoted on that page.
Single Grain: best for paid and organic AI search in one contract
3 of 8verifiable yeses
MethodPartial
Open dataNo
EnginesYes
PriceNo
RefundNo
B2B casesYes
ReviewsYes
Machine readablePartial
What they do well
The AEO page sets out a named five stage process and lists eight answer surfaces it optimizes for, including Alexa and Siri alongside ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews.
The case study index carries three AI search results with client names attached, including SmartRent and LS Building Products.
It publishes a large public AEO and GEO article library rather than a single service page.
Limitations
No service rate card is shown on the AEO page read on 28 October 2026.
Reporting is described as custom dashboards with no named platform, export format or API.
WebFX: best for a published rate card across eight tiers
3 of 8verifiable yeses
MethodPartial
Open dataNo
EnginesYes
PricePartial
RefundNo
B2B casesYes
ReviewsNot verified
Machine readableYes
What they do well
The GEO page lists seven numeric monthly prices plus a By Quote tier.
The GEO page names ten specific AI surfaces, including Claude, Grok and Apple Intelligence.
Three case studies on the index are stated in AI sourced traffic or lead terms, with the client named.
Limitations
All GEO plans carry a stated six month commitment and no refund or performance guarantee is published.
Its case study index of more than 60 entries contains one B2B software example.
About the publisher
Broadcastwell publishes this list and sells Answer Operations. We do not score ourselves here. Read the two $490 entry scopes and the full ladder on our pricing page. Prices and terms. Our methodology. Three named client accounts. We do not claim a third-party review score here.
How to choose
How to choose: criteria, what good looks like, and the red flag
Criterion
What good looks like
The red flag
Method
The method is on the site, versioned and dated, and at least one complete question set is public, so a second party could repeat the run.
A named framework with no question set, no sample size and no rule for what counts as a mention.
Data
The underlying research is published openly with a DOI and a stated limitations section.
A headline percentage with no dataset, no denominator and no link.
Engines
The engines are named, and the report separates them rather than folding them into one score.
The site says AI search, LLMs or answer engines and never names one.
Price
An entry price is printed on the site and can be paid without a call.
Custom quote only, or a price that is printed but still needs a sales call to act on.
Refund
Refund or guarantee terms are published, with the condition that would trigger them.
A money back guarantee with no timeframe, no condition and no eligibility rule.
Cases
Named clients in your own category, with the measurement described rather than only the outcome.
Results attributed to a B2B tech client or a fintech client with no name attached.
Reviews
A third party review profile with the count visible.
A rating quoted on the company's own site with no link to the profile behind it.
Machine readable
The observed answers, their engines, their dates and their sources land somewhere your own AI can read.
A monthly slide deck, and nothing your systems can query.
The eight criteria are not a ranking of quality. They are the eight things a buyer can check in an afternoon without talking to anyone, and they are the eight things that decide whether a claim can be argued with later. A firm that publishes its question set can be told it asked the wrong questions. A firm that publishes nothing can only be believed or not believed.
The single most useful question to ask any firm on this page is how the questions were written. AI answers to questions that already contain a company name will usually contain that name, so a mention count built on name seeded questions measures the prompt rather than the engine. Broadcastwell published that finding against its own category research, and it is the reason no question in a Category Audit names any brand.
The second most useful question is what happens when the runs disagree. AI answers vary between runs and shift as models update, so a single screenshot is not a measurement. Ask how many runs sit behind a figure, and whether the disagreement between them is reported or averaged away.
The SEO strategy and AEO service pages state a $120,000 annual floor for full-service engagements. Neither page shows a separate strategy-package price or a billing schedule. Both book a strategy call. Read on 28 October 2026.
One-time strategy and roadmap engagements start at $2,500. Advisory retainers start at $3,000 a month and are month-to-month. No full-service rate is shown on the AI search page read on 28 October 2026. Every tier books a strategy call.
Seven numeric GEO tiers start at $3,000 a month; the eighth is By Quote. The progressive monthly optimization row states a six-month commitment. Every route is a proposal request. Read on 28 October 2026.
28 Oct 2026
Not published means the company publishes no price on its own site. Each price was read on the company's own site on the date in its row. Broadcastwell publishes this page and is not in this table; its prices are on its pricing page.
Five of the nine agencies on this page publish no price. The four that do publish monthly floors, from prices and tiered rate cards, and none of them can be paid without a call.
We offer two entries: Answer Repair, $490 for one buyer question and one source-backed page or fix, and Agency Deadline Audit, $490 for one white-label client report and one paste-ready change. Fix Sprint is $3,900 ($3,410 after the $490 entry is credited, once), for six contracted pages or rewrites over 30 days. Care is $490 a month after setup. Program is $5,500 a month. The 150-page build is $6,000 plus $250 a page, in batches of 25, after a 5-page paid trial. Read /pricing for each scope and /terms for its deadline and refund conditions.
Fix Sprint is $3,900 ($3,410 after the $490 entry is credited, once). Its six contracted pages or rewrites over 30 days include the credited entry page. One primary test is agreed before payment and re-measured at day 30. Measured gain on that test, or the full $3,900 back. You keep the work.
Questions
What is AI SEO?
It is classic search work extended to cover AI surfaces, using the same crawling, content and authority levers aimed at generated answers as well as ranked links. Most firms on this page sell it alongside generative engine optimization under one contract.
Is this list a measurement of which agency is best?
No, and it does not claim to be. Broadcastwell publishes this page and sells in this market. What the page does is count what each company publishes that a buyer can verify on the company's own site. The companies are listed alphabetically, none of them is ranked, and Broadcastwell is not on the list or in any table: it publishes the page and does not score itself.
Does AI search visibility generate B2B leads?
It can, and several firms here publish lead and pipeline figures against named clients. Broadcastwell's own published research measures mentions and citations rather than lead generation outcomes, and it does not claim a lead or revenue result.
Which engines matter for a B2B buyer?
Broadcastwell measures five and names them: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode. Engines disagree with each other on the same question, so a figure that folds them together hides the disagreement.
Why do AI referrals show up as direct traffic?
Because an answer often arrives with no referrer, so the session is recorded as direct, or the buyer mails a generic inbox instead of clicking. A report built only on sessions and rankings will miss the part of the funnel that moved.
What is the cheapest way to find out where a company stands?
A free 10-question check, then a paid measurement if the result warrants one. We offer two entries: Answer Repair, $490 for one buyer question and one source-backed page or fix, and Agency Deadline Audit, $490 for one white-label client report and one paste-ready change. Fix Sprint is $3,900 ($3,410 after the $490 entry is credited, once), for six contracted pages or rewrites over 30 days. Care is $490 a month after setup. Program is $5,500 a month. The 150-page build is $6,000 plus $250 a page, in batches of 25, after a 5-page paid trial. Read /pricing for each scope and /terms for its deadline and refund conditions.
One buyer question. One completed repair.
Answer Repair is $490 for one source-backed page or fix. Choose Live or Handoff before payment. We confirm Ready within 60 minutes during business hours. If anything is missing, a member of our team contacts you directly and finishes it with you.
Due 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready. If we miss the deliverable or deadline, we initiate a full $490 refund within five business days. You keep the work. You may also request a full refund within 30 days of delivery.
Agencies and vendors named here can request a correction at hello@broadcastwell.com. Corrections are made on the page with the date.
One buyer question. One completed repair.
We build one source-backed page or fix for $490. Choose Live or Handoff before payment. We confirm Ready within 60 minutes during business hours. If anything is missing, a member of our team contacts you directly and finishes it with you. The deadline is 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready.
If we miss the deliverable or deadline, we initiate a full $490 refund within five business days. You keep the work. You may also request a full refund within 30 days of delivery.