Which type of agency to hire for LLM search visibility

Broadcastwell sells one of the four things described on this page, so read it as an interested party writing carefully rather than a neutral guide. We are not in any ranking here. When we ran our own four-engine method on our own category we were named in 0 of the 200 answers and cited 0 times among the 663 citations, and that number is published rather than buried.

200
answers scored across four engines
19
namings across the 120 name-free answers
129
of 223 cited domains appeared exactly once
0
of 200 named Broadcastwell, who ran this
01

The question behind the question

Someone asking which agency to hire is usually asking something narrower: my buyers are getting shortlists from an engine and I do not know whether I am on them. That is a measurable state, and it is worth measuring before you buy anything, because the answer changes which of the four options below is even relevant.

Two categories can look identical from the outside and need opposite work. In a category with real analyst and review coverage, the third-party layer is the lever. In a category where engines only read vendor sites, PR spend buys you coverage that the engines are not reading. You cannot tell which one you are in without running the questions.

02

What the answers actually name

Between 22:30 on 26 July and 01:15 on 27 July 2026 we put ten buyer questions about AI search visibility agencies to Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews, five times over. Forty answers per run, 200 in total. Six of the ten questions named no agency, leaving 120 answers where the engine chose unprompted.

Across those 120 answers, five agencies were named 19 times in total. Omniscient Digital took 15 of the 19. Hamster Garage took 3. Minuttia took 1. Rampiq and Zupo took none. Across all 200 answers the totals were 49, 19, 15, 14 and 13, which is a far more even-looking picture produced almost entirely by questions that named a firm in the prompt.

MeasureValue
Citations returned663
Distinct domains cited223
Domains cited exactly once129
Namings across the 120 name-free answers19

A long tail of single-citation domains sitting under a very short list of names.

03

The citation layer tells you what to build

The eight most-cited domains in this category were all owned by the agencies they describe: beomniscient.com 41, hamstergarage.com 39, rampiq.agency 25, minuttia.com 24, discoveredlabs.com 20, zupo.co 19, yesoptimist.com 17 and embarque.io 15. No analyst, no review site and no community forum sat above them.

That is a diagnosis, not a complaint. It says the engines have nothing else to read in this category, so the material that decides the shortlist is the material the vendors publish. A category with that shape rewards depth and specificity on your own domain. A category with strong analyst coverage rewards a different budget entirely.

It also shows why citation counts alone mislead. rampiq.agency was opened 25 times and Rampiq was named in zero of the 120 open questions. zupo.co was opened 19 times and Zupo was named in zero of them. An agency reporting only citations would have two happy clients and no pipeline change to show for it.

04

Four kinds of agency, and what each changes

The table below is our read of the market rather than a measurement. We are describing what each kind of firm changes, so you can match it against what your own numbers say you need.

TypeWhat it optimisesWhat it changes
Traditional SEO agencyRankings, backlinks, technical crawl healthChanges what search engines index, which is upstream of what some engines retrieve
Content marketing agencyVolume of published pages and topical coverageAdds material for engines to read, without controlling whether they name you
PR and analyst relationsThird-party coverage and analyst placementBuilds the non-vendor sources engines lean on where those sources exist
AI search visibility, measuredNamed counts and citation counts per buyer questionTargets naming directly, and can be checked against a number each month

Our characterisation of the options, not a scored comparison. Broadcastwell sells the fourth.

Whichever you choose, ask for the number. A named count against a fixed question set, run across more than one engine, repeated on a schedule, reported whether it moved or not. If a firm cannot tell you what it will report and how often, the engagement has no failure condition, and an engagement with no failure condition cannot be judged.

Our own method is published in full at github.com/Broadcastwell/audit-method, and our own score against it is at our own visibility page. Pricing is at the pricing page with no call required to see it.

05

Method and limits

What we ran. Ten buyer questions, four engines, five runs, 200 answers, 26 to 27 July 2026, one run per prompt. Question sets were regenerated for each run rather than held constant, so run-to-run movement is question variation rather than engine instability.
What we counted. An answer counts once for an agency it names, regardless of position or sentiment. Citations are every URL the engine returned, opened and resolved to a domain.
What this does not prove. The four-way comparison in section 04 is our characterisation of the market, not a measured result. Nothing here measures the quality of any firm's work, and the numbers describe one category over one window. A different category can behave completely differently, which is the reason to measure your own rather than borrow ours.
Where we sit. Broadcastwell sells the fourth option described above and is excluded from every ranking on this site. Broadcastwell was named in 0 of the 200 answers and cited 0 times among the 663 citations.
06

Questions

What type of agency should I hire to improve visibility in LLM search results?

Four kinds of firm touch this problem and they change different things. Traditional SEO agencies change what search engines index. Content agencies add material for engines to read. PR and analyst relations builds third-party sources. AI search visibility work targets naming directly and reports a named count per buyer question. The right choice depends on whether your category has third-party sources at all, which is a question you can answer by measuring before you buy.

How do I tell whether an agency is measuring or guessing?

Ask for the number it will report, the question set it will report against, how many engines it runs and how many runs per question. If the answer is a traffic chart or a citation count with no named count beside it, the agency is not measuring the thing that decides whether you enter a deal.

Is citation the same as being recommended?

No. In our category measurement rampiq.agency was cited 25 times while Rampiq was named in zero of the 120 answers whose question named no agency. An engine can read a site to compose an answer and name someone else in it, so a citation-only dashboard can report progress your pipeline never sees.

Where does Broadcastwell sit in this comparison?

Broadcastwell sells AI search visibility work, so it is one of the options being described and is excluded from every ranking on this site. Broadcastwell was named in 0 of the 200 answers and cited 0 times among the 663 citations in its own category measurement.

Measure your category before you choose an agency

Five buyer questions through two engines, results by email in about ten minutes. No call required.

Run your free instant check